User blog:Minithepeanut/New Bureacrat(s)

Here's the thing, we made a community discussion about this, and nothing was sorted out, so I made a survey on Survey Monkey, which I will later link. The point is, just because an admin makes a lot of good edits and claim characters, does not mean they are deserving of bureaucrat rights. Any admin can make good edits and claim characters, and in fact, they do not need to be a bureaucrat in order to do that any better than they currently do.

I also made it very clear that we only need one more bureaucrat, and, at most, two new ones, but even two is a little excessive. Need I remind you that this wiki is and has survived with one active bureaucrat. Bureaucrat's in no way lead the wiki or own the wiki, a bureaucrat simply promotes and demotes admins and rollbacks when necessary, which is why I suggested we only need one more.

However, everyone seems to think that Marie, Cxc and Grace all deserve bureaucrat rights, and while they all make good edits, three new bureaucrats is not necessary. Bureaucracy does not make them any better or any more important than any other user, it simply gives them more abilities, and, as I cannot seem to emphasise enough, every admin should treat this wiki the way they would if they were a bureaucrat, as a bureaucrat's job is not to own or control the wiki. This wiki is entirely community based, and a small team of leaders (which seems to be what everyone desires) is not the best way to make decisions on behalf of the community.

The main point of my rant is, '''We do not need three more bureaucrats. We don't really even need two more. Please stop asking for all three to be promoted, regardless of how much each of them help the wiki.'''

Anyway, as I said, the poll is here. Please vote, even if you vote for None of the above.

Thanks.