User blog comment:LiveLoveDance/Declaration of Wikipendence/@comment-3503487-20120827083200

I honestly agree with several things Mini pointed out. However I'm not "on a side". I will just go along and point out some of the things I agree with that everyone has said. I realize that I didn't really thoroughly cover what I wanted to say. I'm probably going to get some hate for this but I feel it needs to be said.

1) cut Mini some slack-- honestly this may be the first week I've ever seen her so inactive. As far as I'm concerned, we all have periods of time when we're less active. No offense to you Marie but there was a time when you were quite inactive here too. However I no longer have doubts about your adminship because you're very active here now and have been doing great.

2) bureaucrats - really, bureaucrats are only needed to promote/demote people. If the other admins just tell the bureaucrats their opinion and the bcrat honors majority I see no need for so many. I think Mini has typically always tried to be fair here. She has been a good bureaucrat and for whatever shortcomings she felt she had, she owned up to it in her comment. Oreo hasn't really been active enough here to know exactly what's going on at times but I don't think "order of commenting" perse is the best representation of this (time zones, life, etc) but I do agree about what you said regarding some of her responses. Pinky is quite inactive but you also have to notice all the coding she can do. She implemented some stuff like the forum for character forms, the inactive user tag, and more, which no offense, but I doubt the rest of us woulda known how to do prior to her. So basically, yes she's not active enough to be a good bureaucrat to